Acute and Critical Care

Original Articles

Pulmonary
Clinical Application of Modified Burns Wean Assessment Program Scores at First Spontaneous Breathing Trial in Weaning Patients from Mechanical Ventilation: Eun Suk Jeong, Kwangha Lee; Acute Crit Care. 2018;33(4):260-268. Published online November 30, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2018.00276

7,987 View
262 Download
6 Web of Science
4 Crossref

Background
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of modified Burns Wean Assessment Program (m-BWAP) scoring at first spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) as a predictor of successful liberation from mechanical ventilation (MV) in patients with endotracheal intubation.
Methods
Patients requiring MV for more than 72 hours and undergoing more than one SBT in a medical intensive care unit (ICU) were prospectively enrolled over a 3-year period. The m-BWAP score at first SBT was obtained by a critical care nursing practitioner.
Results
A total of 103 subjects were included in this study. Their median age was 69 years (range, 22 to 87 years) and 72 subjects (69.9%) were male. The median duration from admission to first SBT was 5 days (range, 3 to 26 days), and the rate of final successful liberation from MV was 84.5% (n=87). In the total group of patients, the successful liberation from MV group at first SBT (n=65) had significantly higher m-BWAP scores than did the unsuccessful group (median, 60; range, 43 to 80 vs. median, 53; range, 33 to 70; P<0.001). Also, the area under the m-BWAP curve for predicting successful liberation of MV was 0.748 (95% confidence interval, 0.650 to 0.847), while the cutoff value based on Youden’s index was 53 (sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 64%).
Conclusions
The present data show that the m-BWAP score represents a good predictor of weaning success in patients with an endotracheal tube in place at first SBT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

What do we know about experiencing end-of-life in burn intensive care units? A scoping review
André Filipe Ribeiro, Sandra Martins Pereira, Rui Nunes, Pablo Hernández-Marrero
Palliative and Supportive Care.2023; 21(4): 741. CrossRef
Effect of a Japanese Version of the Burns Wean Assessment Program e-Learning Materials on Ventilator Withdrawal for Intensive Care Unit Nurses
Rika KIMURA, Naoko HAYASHI, Akemi UTSUNOMIYA
Journal of Nursing Research.2023; 31(4): e287. CrossRef
Value of modified Burns Wean Assessment Program scores in the respiratory intensive care unit: An Egyptian study
Nermeen A. Abdelaleem, Sherif A.A. Mohamed, Azza S. Abd ElHafeez, Hassan A. Bayoumi
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Protecting Postextubation Respiratory Failure and Reintubation by High-Flow Nasal Cannula Compared to Low-Flow Oxygen System: Single Center Retrospective Study and Literature Review
Minhyeok Lee, Ji Hye Kim, In Beom Jeong, Ji Woong Son, Moon Jun Na, Sun Jung Kwon
Acute and Critical Care.2019; 34(1): 60. CrossRef

Infection
Clinical Application of the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score at Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Bacteremia: A Single-Center Experience of Korea: Hae Jung Na, Eun Suk Jeong, Insu Kim, Won-Young Kim, Kwangha Lee; Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(3):247-255. Published online August 31, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00241

6,739 View
180 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Crossref

Abstract PDF

Background
We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (based on the 2016 definition of sepsis) at intensive care unit admission in Korean patients with bacteremia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 236 patients between March 2011 and February 2016. In addition to the qSOFA, the Modified Early Warning score (MEWS) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were calculated. Results: The patients’ median age was 69 years, and 61.0% were male. Of the patients, 127 (53.8%) had a qSOFA score ≥2 points. They had significantly higher rates of septic shock, thrombocytopenia, and hyperlactatemia, and increased requirements for ventilator care, neuromuscular blocking agents, vasopressors, and hemodialysis within 72 hours after intensive care unit admission. They also had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate. When analyzed using common thresholds (MEWS ≥5 and ≥2 SIRS criteria), patients with a MEWS ≥5 had the same results as those with a qSOFA score ≥2 (P < 0.05). However, patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Our results show that a qSOFA score ≥2 at admission is a useful screening tool for predicting disease severity and medical resource usage within 72 hours after admission, and for predicting 28-day mortality rates in patients with bacteremia. In addition, qSOFA scores may be more useful than SIRS criteria in terms of prognostic utility.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping review
Magnolia Cardona, Claudia C. Dobler, Eyza Koreshe, Daren K. Heyland, Rebecca H. Nguyen, Joan P.Y. Sim, Justin Clark, Alex Psirides
Journal of Critical Care.2021; 66: 33. CrossRef
Consensus recommendation: Indications and methods for microbiological wound diagnostics
Axel Kramer, Ojan Assadian, Jürgen Bohnert, Georg Daeschlein, Joachim Dissemond, Veronika Gerber, Peter Hinz, Adam Junka, Simon Kim, Roald Papke, Christian Willy
Wound Medicine.2018; 23: 53. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search